This Is Why You Should STOP Posting Your Kids Online

This Is Why You Should STOP Posting Your Kids Online THIS IS EXACTLY STOP POSTING YOUR KIDS ONLINE. COMPLETELY INNOCENT VIDEO IN THE CAR, ALWAYS TO LIKE THEIR MOM WHO'S THE CHILD PASSENGER? IT STARTS PULLING COMPLETELY SEPARATE INFORMATION FOR EACH OF THEIR NAMES, BIRTH INFORMATION, PICTURES AND VIDEOS IT PULLED A NEWBORN PICTURE FROM MY MOM'S PAGE. THIS VIDEO WAS POSTED BY KALIE ROBINS AND SHE PROCEEDS TO SAY THAT FACEBOOK PULLED UP A PHOTO DELETED YEARS EARLIER AND THEN PROMPTED UP WHERE SHE LIVED. AND THROUGH THE INFORMATION THAT SHE'S POSTED ON SOCIAL MEDIA, IT WAS ABLE TO PINPOINT HER OLD ADDRESS AND HER NEW ADDRESS. AND META'S AI SYSTEM IS ABLE TO PULL THROUGH POSTS THAT YOU'VE EVER MADE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT PEOPLE WANNA KNOW ABOUT YOU. POST SOMETHING ON THE INTERNET, IT'S THERE FOREVER, WHETHER YOU DELETE IT OR NOT. AND ANYTIME YOU POST SOMETHING, YOU'RE CREATING A DIGITAL FOOTPRINT. news A federal judge has ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual's right to privately possess child sexual abuse content created using AI if it does not depict a real person and remains in the home. On Tuesday, Judge John Z. Lee of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th District ruled that the First Amendment protects an individual's right to privately possess images or videos of child sexual abuse created using artificial intelligence if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home. In his ruling, Judge Lee urged the Supreme Court to reconsider the issue of virtual abuse material of children in the age of AI, suggesting that technological advances complicate existing legal precedent. The case Lee ruled on came about in 2024 when the Department of Justice brought charges against Steven Anderegg, alleging that he used AI to create thousands of explicit images of children. He was accused of breaking federal obscenity laws by producing, distributing and possessing obscene visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Anderegg sought to have the possession and production charges dismissed under the First Amendment. Last year, a judge in the Western District of Wisconsin agreed to dismiss the possession charge, prompting the federal prosecutors to appeal. Lee, in his ruling upholding the lower court's decision, cited the precedent set by Supreme Court rulings from 1969 and 2002. One individuals have a right to possess obscenity in the privacy of their home, other found the 'virtual' child sexual abuse material, a real person is not child pornography. SO. CASE YOU NEED ANOTHER REASON TO KIDS ON THE INTERNET, A FEDERAL JUDGE JUST RULED THAT THE FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTS INDIVIDUALS RIGHTS TO PRIVATELY POSSESS SEA SAM CONTENT CREATED USING AI IF IT A REAL PERSON THE HOME. SO EVERY TIME YOU POST YOUR CHILD'S IMAGE AND LIKENESS ON THE INTERNET, PEOPLE CAN TAKE DO WITH IT WHATEVER THEY WANT. HIGHLY DOUBT THAT PEOPLE ARE GOING HOME TO HOME TO CHECK THE AI.C. SAM CONTENT, MAKE SURE THAT IT'S NOT ACTUAL CHILDREN. HER VIDEO BY SAYING THAT SHE'S NO LONGER GONNA BE ON THE INTERNET AND THAT SHE'S ASKING FAMILY AND THE SAME. THE INTERNET HAS BECOME A VERY AND IT'S NOT A PLACE FOR KIDS.