Original caption
At what point does the prosecution stop cross-examining its own theory? 😭 Because this wasn’t a rumor. This wasn’t internet speculation. This wasn’t somebody connecting imaginary dots. THIS WAS TESTIMONY. IN COURT. The prosecution’s own forensic witness testified that a phone records steps REGARDLESS OF WHO IS CARRYING IT. Then testified that with the underlying forensic data, he can determine whether activity originated from the WATCH or the PHONE. So respectfully… If you’re using device activity to reconstruct LINDSAY’S physical movements, you better be able to show: WHICH DEVICE GENERATED IT. And if it was the phone: WHO. WAS. CARRYING. IT. Because “Lindsay’s phone moved” is not the same forensic conclusion as “Lindsay moved.” That’s not a defense theory. That’s not TikTok speculation. That’s what the forensic examiner just explained — after the PROSECUTION asked him. 💀 You cannot make this 💩 up. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #CourtTok #DigitalForensics #TrueCrime