Loading video…
All breakouts
14.9Talking HeadDirect Question hookCreator Economy
Hook
As a photographer, how can I
@mrphotographerguy
2.0K followers · usually 1.5K views a post
Views
21.6K
Likes
309
Comments
228
Shares
35
Why it worked
The video taps into a current, polarizing debate about AI, framing it through a relatable personal dilemma for a specific profession. The direct question and challenge to the audience encourage engagement and discussion.
Summary
The creator, a photographer, questions the hypocrisy of being anti-AI when their primary tool, a camera, is full of AI features like autofocus and auto exposure. They argue that these automated functions are integral to modern photography.
Structure
- 1Introduction of the photographer's dilemma regarding AI
- 2Explanation of AI in photography (autofocus, auto exposure)
- 3Questioning the anti-AI stance given current tool usage
- 4Concluding thought on the hypocrisy
Product placement
Nikon: ACTS - it is the camera used to film the video, and its interface is visible on screen. Removing it would change what happens in the video.
AI: ACTS - it is discussed as a core component of the camera and photography in general. Removing it would change what happens in the video.
On-screen text
As a photographer, how can I
confidently be anti AI when the
main tool I use is full of AI?
See the hypocrisy?
Transcript
Original caption
The definition of AI for me is anything that’s automated is AI. (This is based on the 4 levels of AI) So autofocus, auto exposure, Auto ISO all of that is AI to me. You can, of course, put that kind of automation into a “creatively acceptable” bucket, but yeah, I have a hard time hopping on board the hate train when I’m already using so much AI in my own photography.
More from @mrphotographerguy
More breakout videos from this creator.
