Why it worked
The video likely resonated due to its use of relatable, albeit exaggerated, criticisms of popular tech products, combined with a popular meme format. This taps into common online discourse and humor around consumer electronics.
Summary
The video presents a humorous comparison of popular smartphone brands, Samsung, Vivo, and OnePlus, highlighting perceived negative aspects of each. It uses a meme format with exaggerated criticisms to suggest how users on TikTok might choose which brand to "hate" on a given day.
Product placement
Samsung: ACTS - interface operated, visible result comes from it, someone says what it does for them. Removing it would change what happens in the video.
GLORY ONE VI: ACTS - interface operated, visible result comes from it, someone says what it does for them. Removing it would change what happens in the video.
Vivo: ACTS - interface operated, visible result comes from it, someone says what it does for them. Removing it would change what happens in the video.
OnePlus: ACTS - interface operated, visible result comes from it, someone says what it does for them. Removing it would change what happens in the video.
iPhone: APPEARS - corner watermark, channel or studio logo, end card, credit, name on clothing, repost stamp. Removing it would NOT change what happens in the video.
Apple: APPEARS - corner watermark, channel or studio logo, end card, credit, name on clothing, repost stamp. Removing it would NOT change what happens in the video.