THE CLANCY HOLDOUT JUROR IS FACING EVICTION AFTER 6 MONTHS OF UNPAID RENT

attempted to contact the jury at the home where his landlord is currently trying to vacate him. We're not identifying him because he's chosen to not speak publicly and the jury list is currently impounded. But we wanted to share the details that experts say should have raised red flags about how he filled out his jury questionnaire. Okay, sir, do you have any issue complying with the order that you stay away from and have no contact directly or indirectly with the alleged victim in this case and also that you're not abused this person. You're listening to audio the NBC 10 investigators obtained from Bracton District Court in September 2021. That's when the hold out juror in the Lindsay Clancy case faced a criminal charge for assaulting his wife. According to this police report, the juror's 13-year-old nephew called 911 after seeing his uncle grab his wife by the throat and throw into a dresser. The report says the juror's mom repeatedly screamed, your evil as police arrested him. Court records show the couple divorced after the incident and the criminal charge was eventually dismissed. The ex-wife told me this week she didn't want to testify in the case because she was worried about losing custody of her daughter. Last year that same teenage nephew took out this restraining order. After he says the juror pushed him to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the face. The teen wrote that his uncle then said you ruined my life for calling the police and added, you've had this coming your way for a long time. That restraining order was still active when the juror was selected for the Lindsay Clancy trial and listened to evidence for for weeks in the high profile case. I don't see how they would have allowed him to be a member of this jury. NBC 10's chief legal analyst Michael Cohen is talking about this confidential jury questionnaire, which clearly asks if someone has been arrested, been charged with a crime or been served with a court order. All boxes that should have been checked. If those had all been answered truthfully, do you find it hard to believe that he would have been seated on this jury? I don't see how if those questions have been answered correctly, uh one side or the other would have taken the chance with allowing him to be seated. The 10th investigator also learned the jury hasn't paid the monthly rent at his Plume County home since last March according to housing court records. As jury's deliberate last week, the landlord secured a judgment more than $12,000 in unpaid rent and is moving forward with an eviction. And I'm going to declare. When the Clary ended with no verdict, several jurors told us how the lone out refused He would not interact with us. He was very arrogant. He really did not take anything that anybody said. When the M10 investigators contacted the jury's family members, they said he'd been a strange since the alleged incident with his nephew. None of them knew of his involvement with the clancy trial. One described him as a narcissist who she believed should have never served as a juror in such an important case. What should happen next is the should the court be reviewing that that question and seeing how it was answered. Uh no doubt that the question and will have to be reviewed and the district attorney will look at both the question and the answers and look at the information to see whether that was truthful. It is in fact a crime not to do so. So tonight we've reached out to the Pennsylvania DA's office to ask about our findings along with Clinton's defense team. Both are declining to comment right now, but we'll let you know if that changes. Jury questioners are not public records, so it's unclear if the document in question still exists or if it was destroyed in the wake of the mist trial.