You referred to her consenting.

You referred to her consenting, and from what I read from the excerpts that you or summaries, whatever that you put out today, is that she consented to a threesome with two other guys, but she did not consent to the five other guys that came into the room, and that she hid under the covers, and she pushed one away and nothing that happened with those five other guys sounds consensual at all to me. Am I reading this wrong? Frankly you are. When she was subjected, there were two instances she describes where someone touched her in a way that she didn't want them to touch her, and she told them no. And they did not continue. But consent, or lack of consent is very much, very specific. Under New York state law. You either have to be physically, compelled or forcible compulsion, physical force, or you have to be, physically helpless, which is unconscious, or you have to be mentally incapacitated, which is having been given drugs without your knowledge that rendered you incapable of consenting. None of those things were articulated in her initial statement. That being said, I don't. That's what we knew in 2024. Now we understand that she feels differently and we want to talk with her. We want to give her a chance to speak her truth before the grand jury and tell the rest of the story. Whatever information that she gained and insight she gained in the last two years.