Kimi Code vs Claude Code

@aistartupfren

30.0K followers · usually 3.1K views a post

Views

25.5K

Likes

131

Comments

5

Shares

9

SoundTikTok sound · original sound - aistartupfren

Promoted product

Kimi Code

Kimi Code Documentation

2 videos2 creators

Why it worked

The video leverages a common comparison format (X vs. Y) and addresses a key concern for users: cost-effectiveness. By demonstrating similar performance at a significantly lower price point, it provides a compelling reason for viewers to consider Kimi Code.

Summary

The video compares Kimi Code and Claude Code, two AI models, by having them both generate a list of AI news from today. The creator shows that Kimi Code performs similarly to Claude Code but is seven times cheaper.

Structure

1Introduction of Kimi Code vs. Claude Code
2Comparison of AI intelligence scores
3Cost comparison
4Side-by-side test with the same prompt

Original caption

Kimi k2.6 vs Claude opus4.6 #aistartup #kimi #claudecode #aiagent

More from @aistartupfren

Product placement

The video shows a comparison between Kimi Code and Claude Code, highlighting their performance and cost differences. The creator uses both models to scrape AI news and compares the output.

On-screen text

Kimi Code vs Claude Code Claude Opus 4.7 Kimi K2.6 Input K $0.95 $5.00 Output K $4.00 $25.00

Transcript

Kimi just dropped the model that's supposed to be better than Cloud OS 4.6. If you look at the artificial analysis intelligence score, Kimi K2.6 is actually better than Cloud OS 4.6. Can you actually get similar performance with seven times cheaper price? Let's put it to the test. Here I have Kimi coat and cloud coat side by side with the same exact prom I'm asking them to put together a list of AI news from today. Look at them go. Okay, now they're both done. So this is Kimi Code. It grabbed top 10 stories from Haker News, The Verge, MIT and this is Cloud Code. I say the performance pretty similar, the code they generated to grab all of these new sources pretty similar. But Kimi seven times cheaper. So