The financial milestone that matters isn't $100k

@budgeters_anonymous

102.3K followers · usually 11.4K views a post

Views

54.7K

Likes

1.5K

Comments

91

Shares

166

Why it worked

The video likely performed well due to its relatable topic (retirement planning) and the use of clear, concise calculations presented visually. The creator challenges a common financial milestone ($100k) and offers a compelling alternative, encouraging viewers to consider their own savings strategies.

Summary

The video argues that $100k is not the most important financial milestone for retirement. It demonstrates how saving $150k by age 30, with a 10% annual growth rate, could result in $4.9 million by age 65, or $1.72 million after factoring in inflation. The creator then explores different savings goals and monthly contributions needed to achieve financial independence.

Structure

1The $100k milestone is not the most important.
2Saving $150k by 30 can lead to significant wealth growth.
3Inflation reduces the future value of savings.
4Achieving higher savings goals requires consistent monthly investments.
5Different savings targets lead to different monthly contribution amounts.

Product placement

The video discusses financial planning and retirement savings, using calculations and hypothetical scenarios to illustrate the impact of different savings amounts and investment growth over time. No specific product or service is explicitly mentioned or promoted.

On-screen text

The financial milestone that matters isn't $100k $150k Age 65 = $4.9m = 🍔 $1.72m 4.7% $81k + SS $100k+ 8 years $1k/mo -> $150k $650/mo -> $215k $500/mo -> $300k

Original caption

#retirement #retirementplanning #retirementgoals

More from @budgeters_anonymous

Their other posts in the index, biggest breakout first.

Transcript

If you can get $150,000 saved by the time that you're 30, you can stop saving for retirement forever. This money would continue to grow at about 10% per year. By the time that you turn 65, it would be worth about $4.9 million. But damn, 35 years from now, $4.9 million will barely buy you a cheeseburger. If you do factor in inflation, this is still $1.72 million. That means if you did a 4.7% safe withdrawal, you'd be able to live off $81,000. Plus you'd still be getting social security and so you'd probably be making over $100,000. Now I understand $150,000 is pretty ambitious. It would require you invest $1,000 a month starting at the age of 22 in order to get there. If you can get to $215,000 by the age of 35, this would drop down to $650 a month. And look, if that is too aggressive for you, then maybe coast fire is just not for you. You should try to get to $300,000 by the age of 40, because that would drop it down to $500 a month.