900 MILLION FREE CHATGPT USERS IS

@decoderpod

56.8K followers · usually 4.2K views a post

Views

15.9K

Likes

594

Comments

49

Shares

16

Selling · SaaS › AI Tool

OpenAIseen in 33 videos →

Why it worked

The video taps into a timely and highly debated topic in AI, using a relatable comparison (Google Search) and a personal anecdote to illustrate the complex emotional landscape surrounding AI adoption.

Summary

The video discusses the gap between consumer and enterprise adoption of AI, specifically focusing on OpenAI and ChatGPT. While ChatGPT has a massive user base, the speaker argues that this is more due to Google Search's decline than inherent consumer love for the product, and that emotional responses to AI hinder its widespread adoption.

Structure

1Introduction of ChatGPT's user base and comparison to Google Search.
2Discussion of the gap between enterprise and consumer AI adoption.
3Questioning OpenAI's ability to bridge the consumer gap.
4Analysis of consumer emotions and fears surrounding AI.
5Personal anecdote about the niche nature of AI reporting.
6Conclusion that OpenAI may not be the company to bridge the consumer gap.

Original caption

Nilay on the gap between the consumer and enterprise use cases for AI: "900 million free ChatGPT users is not a reflection of anything but Google Search got really bad and this thing will tell you it loves you." #ai #chatgpt #openai #Tech

More from @decoderpod

Their other posts in the index, biggest breakout first.

Product placement

OpenAI (company that makes ChatGPT) - develops AI technology and products like ChatGPT. It ACTS as the subject of the discussion. Removing it would change the entire video. ChatGPT (product) - an AI chatbot. It ACTS as an example of OpenAI's consumer-facing product. Removing it would change the discussion. Google Search (product) - a search engine. It ACTS as a point of comparison for why ChatGPT is popular. Removing it would change the discussion.

On-screen text

Nilay Patel Editor-in-Chief, The Verge Can OpenAI win over consumers? 900 MILLION FREE CHATGPT USERS IS NOT A REFLECTION OF ANYTHING OTHER THAN, WELL, GOOGLE SEARCH GOT REALLY BAD AND THIS THING WILL TELL YOU IT LOVES YOU. I UNDERSTAND HOW THIS IS GONNA WORK FOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, AND I UNDERSTAND HOW THIS IS GONNA WORK IN ENTERPRISE, ALTHOUGH EVEN THAT'S PRETTY SHAKY STILL. BUT CONSUMERS DON'T LOVE THIS STUFF, AND THERE'S SOME HUGE GAP THERE. DO YOU THINK OPENAI CAN CLOSE THAT GAP? BECAUSE THEY HAVE ALWAYS BEEN THE COMPANY CHASING THE BIG CONSUMER PRODUCT VISION. DO YOU HAVE A SENSE THROUGH ALL THIS REPORTING IF THEY HAVE REALIZED HOW EXISTENTIAL THE CONSUMER SIDE OF THE DEBATE IS? THE GAP IS SO WIDE, AND I DON'T SEE THEM BEING THE ONLY COMPANY TO CLOSE IT IF IT'S EVER GOING TO BE CLOSED. PEOPLE ARE EXTREMELY WORRIED ABOUT SO MANY THINGS WHEN IT COMES TO AI, AND THEY'RE VERY EMOTIONAL ABOUT IT. IT'S NOT JUST LOGIC. I THINK IF IT WAS JUST A LOGICAL GAP, SOME PEOPLE LOGICALLY THINK IT'S NOT GOOD, SOME PEOPLE LOGICALLY THINK IT IS GOOD, I THINK THEY COULD PROBABLY CLOSE THAT. BUT WHEN EMOTIONS COME INTO PLAY, NO, I DON'T THINK THAT THEY WILL BE ABLE TO FULLY BRIDGE THAT GAP. WHEN I BECAME AN AI REPORTER SIX YEARS AGO, NONE OF MY FRIENDS REALLY KNEW OR CARED WHAT I WROTE ABOUT. IT WAS, LIKE, REALLY NICHE. STARTING, LIKE, FOUR YEARS AGO, IT WOULD COME UP AT THE BAR, AT THE CLUB. LIKE, I'LL BE WALKING DOWN THE STREET, SOMEONE'S ASKING ME ABOUT IT, AND THEY DON'T KNOW I'M AN AI REPORTER. SO WHEN THEY LEARN I'M AN AI REPORTER, BUT JUST RANDOMLY, THIS IS COMING UP FOR PEOPLE MAKING THEM EXTREMELY EMOTIONAL. SO YEAH, I JUST DON'T THINK THIS IS GONNA BE THE COMPANY TO BRIDGE THAT GAP.

Transcript

900 million free ChatGPT users is not a reflection of anything other than, well, Google Search got really bad and this thing will tell you it loves you. I understand how this is gonna work for software development, and I understand how this is gonna work in enterprise, although even that's pretty shaky still. But consumers don't love this stuff, and there's some huge gap there. Do you think OpenAI can close that gap? Because they have always been the company chasing the big consumer product vision. Do you have a sense through all this reporting if they have realized how existential the consumer side of the debate is? The gap is so wide, and I don't see them being the only company to close it if it's ever going to be closed. People are extremely worried about so many things when it comes to AI, and they're very emotional about it. It's not just logic. I think if it was just a logical gap, some people logically think it's not good, some people logically think it is good, I think they could probably close that. But when emotions come into play, no, I don't think that they will be able to fully bridge that gap. When I became an AI reporter six years ago, none of my friends really knew or cared what I wrote about. It was, like, really niche. Starting, like, four years ago, it would come up at the bar, at the club. Like, I'll be walking down the street, someone's asking me about it, and they don't know I'm an AI reporter. So when they learn I'm an AI reporter, but just randomly, this is coming up for people making them extremely emotional. So yeah, I just don't think this is gonna be the company to bridge that gap.