How do the midrange A37 cameras compare to the top of the line S26 Ultras?

How do the midrange A37 cameras compare to the top of the line S26 Ultras? Starting with the main camera and as you can see both are actually doing a really good job here. The A37 is actually lifting the shadows a little bit more, which is pretty nice. Switch over to the ultra wide though and now the A37 is significantly less vibrant due to its smaller sensor while the S26 Ultra retains its vibrancy and is very consistent with the main camera. Speaking of which, let's go back to the main camera and do a bokeh test. And as you can see, both have pretty decent bokeh, but the S26 Ultra of course being a little bit better here due to its larger sensor and larger aperture. And then for the colors, the S26 Ultra did miles better here because the A37 tried to overexpose the photo and compensate with HDR while the S26 Ultra just properly exposed it. I'm sure if I load the exposure on the A37, it would have done much better. Now for macro, on the A37 you get an entire 5 megapixel macro lens while on the S26 Ultra you just crop into the 50 megapixel ultra wide since it has autofocus unlike the A37. And as you can see, the A37 actually did quite well here, but the S26 Ultra's colors are just way more natural due to it being a better sensor. Going back to the main camera for a low light test and indoors, and as you can see, the A37 is doing really well here. I actually prefer the red of the bird on the A37, but everything else I am preferring the S26 Ultra. And ending the test with a super low light test, and as you can see, the A37 did not do bad here. It is definitely grainier and that's because Galaxy A phones don't have as much night mode control as the S series phones, plus, you know, larger sensor and larger aperture on the S26 Ultra definitely helps. But overall, the A37 did so much better than I expected here. The S26 Ultra of course did better, but it's not surprising. But it's not surprising.