@kara_marlene — 190x breakout

Loading video…

Lindsay Clancy is INNOCENT!

@kara_marlene

33.2K followers · usually 1.7K views a post

Views

451.5K

Likes

20.1K

Comments

132

1.0K

Why it worked

The video leverages a powerful legal statement to challenge common assumptions and generate discussion, tapping into public interest in high-profile cases and the nuances of the justice system.

Summary

This video features a judge's statement about the burden of proof in a criminal case, emphasizing that the Commonwealth must prove both guilt and criminal responsibility. The creator highlights this statement to counter public assumptions about the defendant's guilt.

Structure

1Judge's statement on burden of proof
2Emphasis on proving guilt and criminal responsibility
3Creator's commentary on public perception
4Call to focus on the judge's exact words

On-screen text

Lindsay Clancy is INNOCENT! THE JUDGE SAID THIS VERBATIM. THE COMMONWEALTH MUST PROVE BOTH: GUILT OF CRIME & CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY

Transcript

The Commonwealth bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime of which she is charged AND ALSO that the defendant is criminally responsible for her conduct. Read that again. AND ALSO. I keep seeing people say: “She’s already guilty.” “She admitted it.” “The only thing th

Original caption

I need people to hear this EXACTLY as the judge said it. Not paraphrased. Not filtered through TikTok. Not through me. Not through somebody in the comments. Straight from the judge: “Commonwealth bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime of which she is charged AND ALSO that the defendant is criminally responsible for her conduct.” Read that again. AND ALSO. I keep seeing people say: “She’s already guilty.” “She admitted it.” “The only thing this trial is deciding is criminal responsibility.” That is NOT what the judge told this jury. The Commonwealth has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt: that she committed the charged crime AND ALSO that she was criminally responsible for her conduct. Both. Lindsay enters this case with the presumption of innocence. An indictment is not proof. An accusation is not proof. A statement is not automatically the end of the analysis. And the defense does not carry the burden of proving her innocent. So when people tell me: “We already know she’s guilty. This trial is only about insanity.” No. Listen to the judge. He could not have said it more clearly. The Commonwealth must prove BOTH beyond a reasonable doubt. That is not my opinion. That is the instruction governing this jury. Save this one for the comments. ⚖️👀 #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #ReasonableDoubt #CriminalResponsibility #CourtTok