@itsgivingrandom0 — 47x breakout

Loading video…

Anyone else think it's kinda unfair to

@itsgivingrandom0

5.8K followers · usually 1.2K views a post

Views

51.5K

Likes

587

Comments

Why it worked

The post taps into viewer engagement by posing a debatable question about fairness and strategy within a popular reality show, encouraging comments and discussion.

Summary

The creator questions the fairness of pairing the two newest professional dancers on Dancing With The Stars with partners who are unlikely to last long in the competition. They argue that this setup prevents viewers from seeing the pros' full choreographic potential if they are eliminated early.

Structure

1Questioning fairness of pro pairings on DWTS
2Highlighting the disadvantage for new pros
3Expressing desire to see more choreo
4Suggesting longer-lasting partners for new pros

Product placement

DWTS (Dancing With The Stars): a reality competition television series where celebrities are paired with professional dancers. It appears as a logo and is the subject of the discussion. Removing it would change the topic of the video. Dancing With The Stars: same as DWTS. It appears as a logo and is the subject of the discussion. Removing it would change the topic of the video.

On-screen text

Anyone else think it's kinda unfair to give the two newest pros someone they knew wouldn't make it far like not saying give them the expected winners but how are we suppose to see what choreo they bring to DWTS if they are both eliminated week 1

Original caption

And yes Adele’s choreo was not good week 1 but she did good choreo on the next pro so what if as Conner improved because say what you want but Conner’s dancing wasn’t good at all but as he improved (because it’s week 1) her choreo improves too like give them someone that will last 3-4 weeks so we can see #dwts #dancingwiththestars #haileybills #stars #pros