Why it worked
The creator uses a relatable observation about people in a specific neighborhood and contrasts it with a popular publication's article, creating a sense of shared experience and mild controversy that encourages engagement.
Summary
The creator expresses amusement and slight annoyance with a New Yorker article about West Village girls, noting its omission of observing men running shirtless with mustaches and heart rate monitors. They suggest this oversight might be worth further investigation.
Structure
- 1Expresses a grievance with The New Yorker article.
- 2Highlights the article's focus on 'West Village girlies'.
- 3Points out the absence of male joggers in the article's description.
- 4Describes specific types of male joggers observed.
- 5Suggests the topic warrants further investigation.
Call to action
Can someone look into this for me?
On-screen text
BONE TO PICK
WITH THE NEW YORKER
THEY WROTE THAT
WEST VILLAGE GIRLS
ARTICLE WHICH IS
HONESTLY HILARIOUS
A SINGLE MENTION
OF GUYS
WALKING TO THE
WEST VILLAGE AND
ON THE WEST SIDE HIGHWAY
MORE SHIRTLESS GUYS RUNNING
WITH PENCIL MUSTACHES
AND THOSE WEIRD
HEART RATE MONITOR
THINGS YOU STRAP
A LOT MORE
GUYS AND HOT
GIRL WALKERS
INVESTIGATING