a real convo at the TTS video review HQ

@watedontwait

6.6K followers · usually 1.2K views a post

Views

9.6K

Likes

916

Comments

64

Shares

75

Why it worked

The video likely worked because it tapped into the creator's existing audience's interest in viral content and provided commentary on trends and platform moderation, sparking discussion and engagement.

Summary

The creator reviews a viral TikTok video of a baby in a bathtub, noting its high view count and questioning if it's AI-generated. They then discuss another video promoting leggings and express concern about its content, before analyzing a video with a "cutting mix" that they had previously removed from their platform.

Structure

1Reviewing a viral baby video
2Discussing a leggings promotion
3Questioning content moderation
4Analyzing a removed video mix

On-screen text

a real convo at the TTS video review HQ www.thedailyvirals.com - To exit full screen, press ESC

Transcript

Alright, let's do some review on videos. Ooh, this one did 34 million views. Look at that cute baby. Wow. That looks like a very real video. Nice. Totally not AI video. This is a great video. Let's keep it pushing. 34 million views. Oh, is that a single Mama 4 promoting leggings? Oh, that's sexual. We need to ban that. Who is this Paypay girl? And why is everybody copying her video? Let's just ban her so everybody else makes the money. Oh, this cutting mix has GLP1 on it. That's the same thing that KindPaches had. And we'd actually deleted that off the app. Huh. Let's keep this one up.