The Downfall OF NIKE

@brandon.fortino

3.8K followers · usually 366 views a post

Views

2.6K

Likes

144

Comments

SoundTikTok sound · original sound - brandon.fortino

Why it worked

The video effectively explains a complex business strategy (the shift from retail to direct-to-consumer and community building) using clear examples and a relatable narrative about a well-known brand (Nike) facing challenges from smaller, innovative competitors. The use of visual aids and a conversational tone makes the information accessible and engaging.

Summary

This video explains how smaller brands like On Running, Hoka, and Allbirds are challenging Nike's dominance by focusing on direct-to-consumer sales, building strong communities, and specializing in specific niches. Nike's traditional retail distribution model and broad product strategy are becoming outdated compared to these agile competitors.

Structure

1Nike's historical reliance on retail distribution
2The shift to direct-to-consumer models by smaller brands
3Building communities and tribal branding
4Focusing on a single niche for perfect execution
5Nike's difficulty in adapting due to size and existing contracts

Product placement

The video discusses Nike and contrasts its strategy with smaller brands like On Running, Hoka, and Allbirds. It shows logos and products from these brands.

Call to action

just shoot me a follow

On-screen text

The Downfall OF NIKE $160 billion COMPANY to smaller brands that you might never heard of Let me explain See Nike built their empire on one thing RETAIL DISTRIBUTION their shoes Footlocker Every Dick's and even every mall in America and for about 40 YEARS that worked out But here's the problem THE GAME HAS Changed And small brands something that Nike didn't See these small brands retail anymore They just need a community how they're WINNING Direct to CONSUMER to consumer You see brands like On Running or Allbirds They don't sell through Footlocker their own websites directly to the consumers that matters the entire EXPERIENCE they can control THE PRICING They can control THE DATA relationship with the customers While Nike doesn't See in marketing direct ownership which is cutting out the middleman the customer relationship directly you own that relationship Now you just that relationship. They build COMMUNITIES built communities not just customers See Nike sells They understand that But brands like On Running running clubs Hoka local races and trail runs like Allbirds They built a whole sustainability in their marketing And the thing is tribal branding selling a product You're actually a group to belong to and hint hint people will actually to be a part of that tribe. Now the third step that they did They focus on ONE THING on one thing and did it perfectly to be everything to the the running training lifestyle fashion if you think smaller brands On Running for running shoes Hoka are more for outdoorsy people and Allbirds comfort one thing PERFECTLY THE BEST at that single lane And in marketing category creation Because they're not competing in Nike's category creating their own And once you own that category Nike can't really touch you. the crazy part It's very hard for Nike to pivot They're too big too slow or locked in into long contracts partnerships just go direct to consumer or just the specific niche There's too big became their WEAKNESS about branding just shoot me a follow

Original caption

Nike is losing ground to much smaller brands. Not because the product is worse. But because their strategy is outdated. Nike was built on retail distribution. For decades, that was the advantage. But the game changed. Smaller brands don’t rely on retail. They sell direct. They own the customer relationship. They control pricing, data, and experience. They also don’t just sell shoes. They build communities. Running clubs. Local races. Shared identity. And instead of trying to be everything, they specialize. One category. One message. One tribe. That’s how smaller brands take market share from giants. And why focus beats scale in 2026. #BrandStrategy #DirectToConsumer #CategoryCreation

More from @brandon.fortino

More breakout videos from this creator.

Transcript

Nike is a $160 billion dollar company. But they're losing to smaller brands that you might never heard of. Let me explain. See Nike built their empire on one thing. Retail distribution. They put their shoes in every Footlocker, every Dick's, and even every mall in America. And for about 40 years, that worked out. But here's the problem. The game has changed. And small brands figured out something that Nike didn't. See these small brands don't need retail anymore. They just need a community. Here's how they're winning. The first thing that they do is to consumer. You see brands like On Running or Allbirds, Hoka. They don't sell through Footlocker. They sell on their own websites directly to the consumers. And that's what matters. They can control the entire experience. They can control the pricing. They can control the data and that relationship with the customers. While Nike doesn't. See in marketing, direct ownership, which is cutting out the middleman and owning the customer relationship directly. You own that relationship. Now you just tend that relationship. The second thing that they did is they build communities, not just customers. See Nike sells shoes. They understand that. But brands like On Running, they build running clubs. Hoka, they sponsor local races and trail runs. And a company like Allbirds, they built a whole sustainability movement in their marketing. And the thing is, we call this tribal branding. You're not just selling a product. You're actually giving a group of people a group to belong to. And hint hint, people will actually pay more to be a part of that tribe. Now the third step that they did is they focus on one thing and did it perfectly. Nike tries to be everything to the basketball folks, the running, training, lifestyle, fashion. But if you think smaller brands, On Running for running shoes, Hoka are more for outdoorsy people, and Allbirds, just sustainable comfort. And when you do one thing perfectly, you'll become the best at that single lane. And in marketing, we call this category creation. Because they're not competing in Nike's category, but they're creating their own. And once you own that category, Nike can't really touch you. But here's the crazy part. It's very hard for Nike to pivot. They're too big, too slow, or locked in into long contracts, partnerships. They can't just go direct to consumer or just the specific niche. There's too big became their weakness. If you want to learn more about branding, just shoot me a follow.