Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5

@agenticamit

12.1K followers · usually 3.9K views a post

Views

4.6K

Likes

93

Comments

12

Shares

6

SoundTikTok sound · original sound - agenticamit

Promoted product

Claude Sonnet 5agenticamit.com ↗

Why it worked

The video effectively uses a native mention strategy by providing a concise and informative overview of a new AI model, Claude Sonnet 5. It highlights key benefits like performance, cost-effectiveness, and advanced capabilities, making it valuable content for those interested in AI tools without being an overt advertisement.

Summary

The video introduces Claude Sonnet 5, highlighting its performance, cost-effectiveness, and ability to handle agentic tasks. It suggests using Sonnet 5 for simpler coding tasks due to its efficiency and autonomy.

Structure

1Introduction of Claude Sonnet 5 as a replacement for Fable 5
2Comparison of Sonnet 5 performance and cost to Opus 4.8
3Explanation of Sonnet 5's flexibility with effort levels and costs
4Highlighting Sonnet 5's strength in agentic tasks
5Recommendation for using Sonnet 5 for specific types of coding tasks

Product placement

The video discusses and shows comparisons for Claude Sonnet 5, an AI model from Anthropic. It also displays testimonials from Factory and Zapier regarding the product's capabilities.

Original caption

Will Sonnet 5 fill the Fable 5 void? #anthropic #claude

More from @agenticamit

On-screen text

Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 Jun 9, 2024 Claude Mythos 5 and Fable 5 access unavailable We are suspending access to Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5. We apologize for this disruption to our customers and are working to restore access as soon as possible. Introducing Claude Sonnet 5 Jun 10, 2024 Sonnet 5 Sonnet 4.6 Opus 4.8 Agentic coding 63.2% 58.1% 69.2% Agentic coding 80.4% 67.0% 82.7% Multidisciplinary reasoning 43.2% 34.6% 49.6% Computer use 57.4% 46.8% 57.8% Computer use 81.2% 75.5% 82.4% Knowledge work 1MB 10MB 5MB Agentic computer use performance by effort level Cost per task [USD, log scale] Sonnet 5 Opus 4.8 Sonnet 4.6 Agentic computer use performance by effort level Cost per task [USD, log scale] Sonnet 5 Opus 4.8 Sonnet 4.6 Feedback from our early access partners has been consistent: Sonnet 5 is much more agentic than its predecessors. Testers described how it finishes complex tasks where previous Sonnet models would stop short, how it checks its own output without explicitly being asked, and how it does all this agentic work at an attractive price point. Sonnet 5 Shepard Senior Engineer FACTORY Claude Sonnet 5 gives our agents a strong execution layer for multi-step software engineering work. It handles sustained coding, tool use, and debugging well across messy technical contexts, and has been especially useful for workflows where follow-through and technical grounding matter. Zimu Li Member of Technical Staff ZAPIER We handed Claude Sonnet 5 a two-part job—launch announcement to enterprise contacts—and it finished end to end. That used to stall halfway. For day-to-day automation, it's a no-brainer. Daniel Shepard Senior Engineer

Transcript

The drop it was supposed to bring back their most powerful AI model, but they just gave us this instead. Anthropic just launched Sonnet 5. This is everything you need to know in under 50 seconds. Firstly, the performance you get with Sonnet 5 is almost on par on coding tasks with Opus 4.8, but at a fraction of the cost. Secondly, you now have a wide range of costs with respect to effort task, so you can choose a low effort task for Sonnet 5 and pay a minimal amount of tokens, getting good performance. Thirdly, on a lot of tests that they ran with partners, they've shown that Sonnet 5 is really good at agentic tasks, which means that anything you throw at Sonnet 5 at, it'll be not cost-effective, but autonomously out certain complete long horizon tasks. So finally, I would take Sonnet 5 and throw it at some of your minimal coding tasks that don't require huge refactors, huge feature development,