Hook

Their other posts in the index, biggest breakout first.
Has there been a study on Native American DNA? Their ancestors came from that area originally, do they have any Denisovan DNA? Let's talk about Native American DNA and ancient humans in this video. I wanna break down a few different genes that they got from ancient human species and also just the history of the history of sapiens in the Americas. Because as you can see, this is a very, very controversial subject. And that controversy has been heating up since. Now, this was a paper published in April. It was purely about the genetics of a population that had previously been very understudied. Based on the DNA, the American continent began at least 15,000 years ago. However, the ancestry of Indigenous American populations traces back further in time, beginning around 25,000 years ago on and around the Beringian Land Bridge. So any hybridization that occurred with these now extinct, that occurred deeper before that Native American population had became isolated. This study was published in 2021, and it was the first study that found evidence of a gene from a different human species, the development of the face. And it was highest frequency in populations that were in Latin America. This trait came from the Denisovans. They can tell it seems to impact the lip thickness. That same team published another paper that found evidence of a Neanderthal in East Asian populations and Native American populations that seemed to impact the height of the nose. This trait was they think it a benefit in colder regions. So perhaps as that ancestral population was on the mammoth steppe for thousands of years, evolving in isolation, this nose trait became more common. And then more recently, another gene variant has been identified in of a mystery. They don't know what it does. They think it probably does something for the immune system, just because the evidence suggests it was selected so strongly for in the ancestors of Native Americans. Said they don't does. They want to, they hope that past study kind of inspires future work. Something interesting here is that when they published this paper, they describe this gene as like being ored in with other DNA. It is surrounded by Neanderthal DNA. So they think it entered the sapien's gene pool through hybridization with Neanderthals, even though it originated with Denisovans. It went from Denisovans to Neanderthals, from Neanderthals to sapiens. One other thing, first Americans had Indigenous Australian genes. This is the headline of an actual Live Science article. It is very misleading. It has caused a lot of confusion. What the paper actually found was a deep genetic affinity between coastal Pacific and Amazonian natives evidenced by Australasian ancestry. That doesn't suggest people came from Australia to South America. It's talking about deeper in the past, a population that would have shared some ancestry with groups that continued moving this way, and groups that continued moving this way. If you stuck around this long, follow. I'm gonna talk about this study in a video to really kind of set the scene. And this question from a commenter this morning, it was the perfect way to set the scene for this video. Because now we'll talk about the Clovis people, and I'm starting to think they fit into this entire story.