More than you might think,

@hamid.ghoraishi

6.4K followers · usually 5.9K views a post

Views

62.4K

Likes

4.3K

Comments

190

840

Why it worked

The video effectively uses a thought-provoking and philosophical topic (the simulation hypothesis) combined with relatable analogies (video games, phone storage) and references to well-known figures (Elon Musk, Nick Bostrom) to engage viewers. The pacing and visual aids help to explain complex ideas in an accessible way, making it shareable and likely to generate discussion.

Summary

The video explores the simulation hypothesis, suggesting that our reality might be a computer simulation. It presents arguments from Nick Bostrom and Dr. Melvin Vopson, using analogies from video games and phone storage to illustrate how a simulated universe might function and why the speed of light could be a limitation imposed by programmers. The presenter concludes that there's a high probability we are in a simulation with little chance of being in the 'real' world.

Structure

1Introduction to the simulation hypothesis
2Nick Bostrom's arguments on technological advancement and simulation creation
3The probability of being in a simulation based on the number of simulated worlds
4Dr. Melvin Vopson's hypothesis using phone storage and DNA compression as analogies
5The speed of light as a potential simulation limitation
6Conclusion on the high probability of living in a simulation

Call to action

Complete video on YouTube (Link in Bio)

Original caption

آیا ما در یک شبیه‌سازی کامپیوتری زندگی می‌کنیم؟ با پیشرفت خیره‌کننده هوش مصنوعی و قدرت پردازش سیستم‌ها، این احتمال که جهان ما تنها یک شبیه‌سازی باشد، بیش از پیش جدی شده است. در سال ۲۰۰۳، فیلسوفی از دانشگاه آکسفورد استدلالی منطقی ارائه داد: با توجه به سرعت پیشرفت تکنولوژی، تمدن ما در آینده قادر خواهد بود جهان‌های مجازی متعددی با موجودات آگاه بسازد. اگر چنین توانایی‌ای شکل بگیرد، میلیاردها شبیه‌سازی به صورت خودکار اجرا خواهد شد. در نتیجه، از نظر آماری و در برابر میلیاردها واقعیت مجازی، شانس اینکه ما در تنها واقعیت اصلی زندگی کنیم تقریبا صفر است؛ دیدگاهی که شخصیت‌هایی نظیر ایلان ماسک نیز بر آن تاکید دارند. علاوه بر احتمالات آماری، نشانه‌های فیزیکی نیز این فرضیه را تقویت می‌کنند. به عنوان نمونه، در بازی‌های ویدیویی (مانند ماینکرفت)، محیط تنها زمانی پردازش و بارگذاری می‌شود که بازیکن به آن نگاه کند تا پردازنده‌ی سیستم دچار فروپاشی نشود. در جهان هستی نیز «سرعت نور» می‌تواند نقش مشابهی داشته باشد. در واقع، سقف سرعت نور ممکن است محدودیتِ انتقالی باشد که برنامه‌نویسانِ این جهان تعیین کرده‌اند تا سیستمِ شبیه‌ساز، فرصت کافی برای بارگذاری محیطِ پیش رو را داشته باشد و دچار اختلال نشود. با وجود تمام شواهدی که بر شبیه‌سازی بودن جهان تاکید دارند، استدلال فوق‌العاده‌ای وجود دارد که احتمال واقعی بودن ما را به طرز چشمگیری افزایش می‌دهد. برای مشاهده ی این استدلال ویدیوی کامل را از کانال یوتیوب تماشا کنید. نظر شما چیست؟ اگر فرض کنیم جهان واقعاً یک شبیه‌سازی است، به نظر شما بزرگ‌ترین باگ یا خطایی که برنامه‌نویسان هنگام ساخت سیستمِ «ایران» به جا گذاشته‌اند، چیست؟ #شبیه_سازی #هوش_مصنوعی #اسرار_کیهان

More from @hamid.ghoraishi

Their other posts in the index, biggest breakout first.

On-screen text

More than you might think, of that thing that you're thinking about. There's a real chance that we and everyone around us are just a simulation. AI and computers are advancing at a mind-blowing rate. If this trend continues, the day will come when we can simulate an entire world. Now if we can simulate, how would we know that another civilization hasn't already done this to us? A philosopher at Oxford University raised this idea back in 2003. And he gave three to back it up. First, technology is advancing at an incredible at this rate, computers will be powerful enough to simulate a world where we actually think they're alive. And third, if a civilization can build one of these worlds, they could easily simulated world simulated world. So if we can simulate the characters in that world will one day advance and create their own simulated world. and it could go on forever. The dark part is that all the creatures in think they're living in the real. The implication is terrifying. When we only have one real world and alongside simulated worlds, the chance that we're actually in that one real world is essentially zero. Meaning there's a very high probability that we're inside. A while ago, Elon Musk made this exact argument and said that with this level where we have the chance our world is real is one in a. Now there are also some signs that if you pay attention, you can actually be in a simulation. Let me explain it with a game like Minecraft. In this game, the computer can't load the entire map at once because it would require insane processing power. The system only that you're currently looking at. Now if you could move through the game at an incredibly high speed, you'd outpace the world being you and the game crash. That's exactly why there's a speed cap in the so the system has enough time to render the world ahead of. Now think about the speed of light. Why can't we move faster than the speed of light? Maybe it's a limitation that programmers placed on this world so that the system has enough time to render the environment without crashing. Let's look at another example that shows we might be in a simulation, one that was recently introduced by a physicist. This physicist proposed a fascinating hypothesis, with an example. When your phone running low on the system tries to compress files or clear extra data to run more efficiently. This physicist's that the exact same thing happens throughout the entire universe. From the DNA in atoms and all galaxies, the universe is constantly compressing and optimizing its data to become more efficient. Just like a smart computer system. Of course, hypothesis and hasn't been proven. So up to this point, there's a good chance we're in a simulation, with very little chance of it being real. But there's a very compelling argument that raises the probability of us being real in a striking

Transcript

More than you might think, of that thing that you're thinking about. There's a real chance that we and everyone around us are just a simulation. AI and computers are advancing at a mind-blowing rate. If this trend continues, the day will come when we can simulate an entire world. Now if we can simulate, how would we know that another civilization hasn't already done this to us? A philosopher at Oxford University raised this idea back in 2003. And he gave three to back it up. First, technology is advancing at an incredible at this rate, computers will be powerful enough to simulate a world where we actually think they're alive. And third, if a civilization can build one of these worlds, they could easily simulated world simulated world. So if we can simulate the characters in that world will one day advance and create their own simulated world. and it could go on forever. The dark part is that all the creatures in think they're living in the real. The implication is terrifying. When we only have one real world and alongside simulated worlds, the chance that we're actually in that one real world is essentially zero. Meaning there's a very high probability that we're inside. A while ago, Elon Musk made this exact argument and said that with this level where we have the chance our world is real is one in a. Now there are also some signs that if you pay attention, you can actually be in a simulation. Let me explain it with a game like Minecraft. In this game, the computer can't load the entire map at once because it would require insane processing power. The system only that you're currently looking at. Now if you could move through the game at an incredibly high speed, you'd outpace the world being you and the game crash. That's exactly why there's a speed cap in the so the system has enough time to render the world ahead of. Now think about the speed of light. Why can't we move faster than the speed of light? Maybe it's a limitation that programmers placed on this world so that the system has enough time to render the environment without crashing. Let's look at another example that shows we might be in a simulation, one that was recently introduced by a physicist. This physicist proposed a fascinating hypothesis, with an example. When your phone running low on the system tries to compress files or clear extra data to run more efficiently. This physicist's that the exact same thing happens throughout the entire universe. From the DNA in atoms and all galaxies, the universe is constantly compressing and optimizing its data to become more efficient. Just like a smart computer system. Of course, this hypothesis and hasn't been proven. So up to this point, there's a good chance we're in a simulation, with very little chance of it being real. But there's a very compelling argument that raises the probability of us being real in a striking