Opus 5 is great but I'm back to my model router

@sourcetms

52.5K followers · usually 3.9K views a post

Views

39.2K

Likes

1.3K

Comments

96

Shares

67

SoundTikTok sound · original sound - sourcetms

Promoted product

Model router

Why it worked

The video likely resonated with viewers experiencing similar performance issues with AI tools, offering a relatable problem and a practical solution that is easy to implement.

Summary

The creator explains they have switched back to using a 'model router' and 'fusion' for front-end work after finding Opus 5 to be too resource-intensive. They find the new approach simpler and faster, allowing them to complete tasks without lengthy waits.

Structure

1Introduction of Opus 5 and switch to model router
2Reason for switching: Opus 5 is a 'guzzler'
3Description of current work: simple front-end tasks
4Explanation of limitations with Opus 5
5Preference for model routers and fusion for ease and speed

Product placement

Original caption

I have been using routers and fusion models because it makes my life so much easier and the job still gets done without having to wait long or go through really slow coding. #ai #Tech

More from @sourcetms

On-screen text

Opus 5 is great but I'm back to my model router USING STOPPED THING GUZZLER. DOING END NOTHING COMPLEX WAS ON NOTIFICATIONS ALREADY LIMITS SIMPLE WAS OF MODEL AND HAS POPULAR EASIER OF THINK TO WHICH HIGHLY RECOMMEND.

Transcript

I was using Opus 5 but I stopped using it because the thing is a damn token guzzler. I've been doing some simple front end work, literally nothing complex. Was on updates on toast notifications already hit my limits. For one simple change was of five minutes of work. Using model routers and using fusion has become more popular because it's just easier of in terms of not having to think about what to select which highly recommend.