WOMEN'S LOGIC IS SO BAD.

@fawcette_

25.9K followers · usually 12.8K views a post

Views

498.0K

Likes

60.3K

Comments

1.2K

10.4K

SoundTikTok sound · original sound - fawcette_

Why it worked

The video likely resonated due to its provocative and controversial take on gender dynamics, using a simple analogy to make a complex and divisive point. The use of strong, declarative statements and a confident delivery style can appeal to a specific audience seeking validation for similar viewpoints.

Summary

The speaker uses the analogy of drawing a star to explain what they perceive as the "circular" and contradictory logic of women. They contrast the perceived inconsistency in women's views on issues like abortion and age-gap relationships with men's perceived logical consistency. The video concludes by stating that women are emotional and not meant for logic, and that understanding this will improve one's life.

Structure

1Introduction to "women's logic" as circular and contradictory.
2Analogy of drawing a star to illustrate circular reasoning.
3Critique of perceived contradictions in women's stances on abortion and age-gap relationships.
4Assertion that women are emotional and men are logical.
5Conclusion that understanding this illogical state improves life.

Product placement

KICK (a streaming platform) APPEARS as a watermark in the bottom green bar. Removing it would not change what happens in the video.

On-screen text

KICK kick.com/FAWCETTE WOMEN'S LOGIC IS SO BAD. ALL THEIR REASONING IS CIRCULAR. SEE WOMEN DON'T HAVE REASONING BECAUSE CIRCULAR REASONING INCREMENTALLY BRINGS YOU BACK AROUND. THEY DON'T BELIEVE IN INCREMENTAL THINGS. THEY BELIEVE IN LIKE STAR I ACTUALLY TALKED ABOUT THIS KIND OF LOGIC A FEW STREAMS I CALL IT STAR LOGIC. KINDERGARTEN AND THEY ASKED YOU TO DRAW A STAR. YOU WOULD START FROM ONE CORNER, GO UP, GO DOWN, YOU WOULD GO LEFT, GO RIGHT, AND GO BACK TO WHERE YOU STARTED, MAKING A STAR. EVERY TIME YOU MADE A POINT OF YOU HAD TO GO IN A COMPLETELY OPPOSITE DIRECTION IN ORDER TO MAKE ALL FIVE POINTS. THIS IS HOW WOMEN'S LOGIC WORKS. JUST START FROM THIS POINT. LET'S JUST SAY A WOMAN BELIEVES THAT, OH, UNALIVING SOMEONE IS SO BAD, I DON'T KNOW WHY ANYONE WOULD DO THAT. UNALIVING PEOPLE SO HORRIBLE. AND THEN IN THE SAME BREATH, THEY GO AHEAD AND SUPPORT PLANNED PARENTHOOD. THEY SUPPORT A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO GET RID OF HER CHILD AT THE DROP OF A HAT. I'M A WOMAN, I HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO YOU CAN HAVE THAT OPINION. BUT YOU CANNOT HAVE THAT AND THEN GO AROUND AND CLAIM IN THE THIRD BREATH MY BODY, MY CHOICE, HER BODY, HER CHOICE. WELL, WHAT IF YOU JUST DESTROYED THE BODY OF YOUR FEMALE CHILD-TO-BE? WHAT IF THE CHILD IN YOUR WOMB WAS A WOMAN, OKAY? BY YOU VACUUMING HER OUT OF YOUR BODY, YOU JUST VIOLATED HER CHOICE BECAUSE YOU DESTROYED HER BODY, RIGHT? THESE THINGS ARE CONTRADICTING ONE ANOTHER. BUT THEN THEY'LL SAY MY CHOICE, HER BODY, HER CHOICE. BUT THEN WHEN IT COMES TO A 19-YEAR-OLD GIRL DATING A 25-YEAR-OLD GUY OR A 30-YEAR-OLD GUY, THEY GO, OH MY GOODNESS, THAT'S SO ICKY. A 19-YEAR-OLD GIRL AND A 30-YEAR-OLD GUY. OH MY GOODNESS, THAT'S SO GROSS. EVEN THOUGH THAT'S A CONSENSUAL RELATIONSHIP THAT IS NOT ILLEGAL IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, AND FORM, THEY ARE NOW CONTRADICTING THE HER BODY, HER CHOICE MOVEMENT BY CRITICIZING HER CHOICE WITH HER BODY. A CONTRADICTION. AND THEN LASTLY, THEY'LL SAY, OH, ANY GUY WHO'S 30 OR 28 PREYING ON THESE 19-YEAR-OLD GIRLS, OH, THEY'RE JUST LIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN. AND I HATE THOSE MEN THAT ARE LIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN. WE SHOULD PUT THEM ALL TO WE SHOULD UNALIVE ALL OF THEM. WHICH AGAIN IS A CONTRADICTION TO THE VERY FIRST THING THEY SPOKE ABOUT. OH YOU BELIEVE THAT ALL UNALIVING IS WRONG. OH EXCEPT WHEN IT'S A PERSON WHO DOES A CRIME THAT I DON'T LIKE. NO YOU CAN'T SAY THAT. YOU CAN'T GO EXCEPT FOR PEOPLE I DON'T LIKE THAT ARE COMMITTING CRIMES THAT I BELIEVE ARE HEINOUS. YOU CAN'T DO THAT. EITHER UNALIVING PEOPLE IS BAD. OR UNALIVING IS GOOD IN CERTAIN BUT YOU CANNOT HOLD ALL FIVE OF THESE THINGS LOGICALLY AT THE SAME TIME AND HAVE IT BE LOGICALLY CONSISTENT. NEXT TIME YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND A WOMAN'S LOGIC, JUST REMEMBER SHE HERSELF LIVES IN AN ILLOGICAL STATE. SHE'S NOT MEANT FOR LOGIC. MEN ARE MEANT TO BE EMOTIONAL. SHE'S MEANT TO BE EMOTIONAL. AND ONCE YOU FIGURE THAT YOUR LIFE GETS 10 TIMES BETTER.

Original caption

Ever wonder why arguments with women feel like you're chasing points on a star instead of following a straight line? Apparently, it’s all about star logic, and once you spot the contradictions, you can never unsee them. #logic #relationships #datingadvice #mindset #starlogic #womenslogic #women #fyp

More from @fawcette_

More breakout videos from this creator.

Transcript

WOMEN'S LOGIC IS SO BAD. ALL THEIR REASONING IS CIRCULAR. SEE WOMEN DON'T HAVE REASONING BECAUSE CIRCULAR REASONING INCREMENTALLY BRINGS YOU BACK AROUND. THEY DON'T BELIEVE IN INCREMENTAL THINGS. THEY BELIEVE IN LIKE STAR. I ACTUALLY TALKED ABOUT THIS KIND OF LOGIC A FEW STREAMS. I CALL IT STAR LOGIC. KINDERGARTEN AND THEY ASKED YOU TO DRAW A STAR. YOU WOULD START FROM ONE CORNER, GO UP, GO DOWN, YOU WOULD GO LEFT, GO RIGHT, AND GO BACK TO WHERE YOU STARTED, MAKING A STAR. EVERY TIME YOU MADE A POINT OF YOU HAD TO GO IN A COMPLETELY OPPOSITE DIRECTION IN ORDER TO MAKE ALL FIVE POINTS. THIS IS HOW WOMEN'S LOGIC WORKS. JUST START FROM THIS POINT. LET'S JUST SAY A WOMAN BELIEVES THAT, OH, UNALIVING SOMEONE IS SO BAD, I DON'T KNOW WHY ANYONE WOULD DO THAT. UNALIVING PEOPLE SO HORRIBLE. AND THEN IN THE SAME BREATH, THEY GO AHEAD AND SUPPORT PLANNED PARENTHOOD. THEY SUPPORT A WOMAN'S RIGHT TO GET RID OF HER CHILD AT THE DROP OF A HAT. I'M A WOMAN, I HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO YOU CAN HAVE THAT OPINION. BUT YOU CANNOT HAVE THAT AND THEN GO AROUND AND CLAIM IN THE THIRD BREATH MY BODY, MY CHOICE, HER BODY, HER CHOICE. WELL, WHAT IF YOU JUST DESTROYED THE BODY OF YOUR FEMALE CHILD-TO-BE? WHAT IF THE CHILD IN YOUR WOMB WAS A WOMAN, OKAY? BY YOU VACUUMING HER OUT OF YOUR BODY, YOU JUST VIOLATED HER CHOICE BECAUSE YOU DESTROYED HER BODY, RIGHT? THESE THINGS ARE CONTRADICTING ONE ANOTHER. BUT THEN THEY'LL SAY MY CHOICE, HER BODY, HER CHOICE. BUT THEN WHEN IT COMES TO A 19-YEAR-OLD GIRL DATING A 25-YEAR-OLD GUY OR A 30-YEAR-OLD GUY, THEY GO, OH MY GOODNESS, THAT'S SO ICKY. A 19-YEAR-OLD GIRL AND A 30-YEAR-OLD GUY. OH MY GOODNESS, THAT'S SO GROSS. EVEN THOUGH THAT'S A CONSENSUAL RELATIONSHIP THAT IS NOT ILLEGAL IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, AND FORM, THEY ARE NOW CONTRADICTING THE HER BODY, HER CHOICE MOVEMENT BY CRITICIZING HER CHOICE WITH HER BODY. A CONTRADICTION. AND THEN LASTLY, THEY'LL SAY, OH, ANY GUY WHO'S 30 OR 28 PREYING ON THESE 19-YEAR-OLD GIRLS, OH, THEY'RE JUST LIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN. AND I HATE THOSE MEN THAT ARE LIKE JEFFREY EPSTEIN. WE SHOULD PUT THEM ALL TO WE SHOULD UNALIVE ALL OF THEM. WHICH AGAIN IS A CONTRADICTION TO THE VERY FIRST THING THEY SPOKE ABOUT. OH YOU BELIEVE THAT ALL UNALIVING IS WRONG. OH EXCEPT WHEN IT'S A PERSON WHO DOES A CRIME THAT I DON'T LIKE. NO YOU CAN'T SAY THAT. YOU CAN'T GO EXCEPT FOR PEOPLE I DON'T LIKE THAT ARE COMMITTING CRIMES THAT I BELIEVE ARE HEINOUS. YOU CAN'T DO THAT. EITHER UNALIVING PEOPLE IS BAD. OR UNALIVING IS GOOD IN CERTAIN BUT YOU CANNOT HOLD ALL FIVE OF THESE THINGS LOGICALLY AT THE SAME TIME AND HAVE IT BE LOGICALLY CONSISTENT. NEXT TIME YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND A WOMAN'S LOGIC, JUST REMEMBER SHE HERSELF LIVES IN AN ILLOGICAL STATE. SHE'S NOT MEANT FOR LOGIC. MEN ARE MEANT TO BE EMOTIONAL. SHE'S MEANT TO BE EMOTIONAL. AND ONCE YOU FIGURE THAT OUT, BRO, YOUR LIFE GETS 10 TIMES BETTER.