@kara_marlene — 47x breakout

Loading video…

Aug 26: Lindsay Clancy Case

@kara_marlene

29.9K followers · usually 3.3K views a post

Views

230.2K

Likes

6.1K

Comments

652

779

Why it worked

The video provides a concise and clear explanation of a significant legal ruling in a high-profile case, making complex legal information accessible to a general audience.

Summary

The judge ruled against a "Bowden instruction" in the Lindsay Clancy case, meaning the defense can argue any perceived failures in the investigation. However, the judge will not provide a special jury instruction to highlight these arguments.

Structure

1Judge's ruling on Bowden instruction
2Defense can argue investigation failures
3No special jury instruction for these arguments

On-screen text

Aug 26: Lindsay Clancy Case JUDGE: NO BOWDEN INSTRUCTION — BUT RED CAN ARGUE EVERY FAILURE. ⚖️ The Judge Just Ruled on Red's "No Investigation" Argument

Transcript

I am going to give a manslaughter instruction in line with page 8. I am not going to give a Bowden instruction. But Red can argue every failure. The judge just ruled on Red's "No Investigation" argument. The judge is not going to put a special instruction around that argument for the jury. So Red can still stand up in closing and say: They didn’t test this. They didn’t preserve that. They relied too heavily on Patrick. They failed to verify key details. They assumed instead of investigating. The difference is this: The judge is not going to put a special instruction around that argument for the jury. So

Original caption

The judge just made the call. He will NOT give the jury a Bowden instruction. But— Reddington is completely free to argue every deficiency he believes exists in the investigation. So Red can still stand up in closing and say: They didn’t test this. They didn’t preserve that. They relied too heavily on Patrick. They failed to verify key details. They assumed instead of investigating. The difference is this: The judge is not going to put a special instruction around that argument for the jury. So now it becomes a persuasion battle. Red gets to tell the jury the investigation was deeply flawed. The Commonwealth gets to argue that there was still enough investigation and evidence. And the jury decides how much those failures matter. That is a big ruling because Red did NOT get the formal instruction he wanted— but he still gets to put the investigation itself on trial in closing. #LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #KevinReddington #CourtTok #TrialTok