Anything!! Thoughts? Questions? Cases?

Do I think Patrick Clancy did it? I think it’s possible. And the reason I say that is not because I have proof that Patrick killed his children. I don’t. It’s because I think the investigation was so narrow, so incomplete, and so willing to accept one theory early that it left too many unanswered questions behind. When you have a triple homicide inside a family home, I think every adult connected to that scene should be scrutinized hard. Evidence should be tested. Timelines should be challenged. Statements should be corroborated. Alternative possibilities should be ruled out with evidence — not assumptions. And when that doesn’t happen, reasonable doubt grows. So yes: I think Patrick should have been treated as a serious investigative possibility until the evidence ruled him out. Whether he actually did it? That remains an allegation I cannot prove. But I absolutely understand why people are asking. #LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #lindsayClancyTrial #ReasonableDoubt #TrueCrimeCommentary