Should the United States be worried about Iran retaliating?

Should the United States be worried about an attack back from Iran? Us? Yeah. Here? Yes. Well, not like a direct attack. They're not going to launch missiles at us. If anything, after this, you got to be concerned about proxies, terrorist attacks. That's how they've always done it. That's how Iran's always done things all over the world through its proxies and through like, you know, bombings and this and that. But as far as a direct like military action from them, here, no freaking way. What about US military bases? They already launched, they already attacked. Yeah, on that. They immediately launched missiles to Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iran did as a retaliation, which is like a dumb move on their hand. Because the US didn't get like international support. It didn't go to the UN as usual, you know, in this situation with this with this administration. They just went out there and just, you know, gunsling, right? Speaking of the devil. Right. Um, but we didn't get support. So I think the way Iran retaliated was actually a detriment to them to their standing. Because you just lobbed missiles at countries that probably probably weren't even involved and probably would likely be leaning towards being on your side like like like, you know, in in in in the Arab world. But you just freaking lobbed on them and now you just basically gave them card blanche to like, oh, you know what? We're going to support the US now that you freaking lobbed missiles at us. Even though you were going after US bases, you know, like in Dubai, they had to like freeze the airspace because missiles were going over, you know, the UAE. You know? So, I think as far as us, no, you got to worry about, you know, some proxy, you know, blowing up a concert or a bus or something. I mean, you know what I mean? Yeah. But over there, like no, like no, I don't think we have to worry about anything.