Hook

Their other posts in the index, biggest breakout first.
In my last video, I talked about how we can get market upside and cut off the downside for a small carry cost of about 2.4% over a year, about 1% a year. The question is, can we pay no carry cost? Can we get upside and pay nothing on the downside? If the market crashes, we're flush, we don't lose any money. The answer is, it's real simple. To get rid of that cost, what we have to do is buy less calls. If each call costs $2020 and I have $74,000 of overage, I would buy less calls. In this particular case, 36-37 less calls. 163 calls, I would have no downside at all, but I would capture 81% of the upside. Well, wait a minute. Upside. Yeah, I'm cutting off my downside, but I don't want to cut off here's what I'm forgetting. A 60/40 stock bond mix, it only gives you 44% on the upside. If the market's up 10, you're up 4.4%. But if the market's down 10, you're down 5%. The strategy I just explained, you're up. Markets up 10%, the markets down 10%, you're zero. How about a more aggressive mix? Those young people that want to be aggressive. Time. Well, in an 80/20 mix, that's only about 70% of the upside, but 75% of the downside. Markets up 10%, you're up 7%. Markets down, you're down 7.4%. I'm down. Here's what's interesting. If you look at only getting 74% of the upside over a 20-year period, that the markets I'm up 7.5%. The markets down, I'm flat. I would have that at 9.25% annualized. That at 9.25% where's the S&P? Long the market at 100% of the upside, I'd only get 7.03%. Because I'd also capture 100% of the downside. The 60/40 is not even is good. Annuities, forget about it. Even the aggressive Nasdaq would have done worse. Well, done a little bit better over a long term, of course, but the risk is a lot higher. In this strategy. I talk about the numbers. The numbers don't lie. The numbers speak for themselves. Hopefully, this was helpful in seeing a better way to run money. Thank you for listening.