/ultrareview vs. codex

@oliviaintech

2.7K followers · usually 998 views a post

Views

3.7K

Likes

90

Comments

6

Shares

4

SoundTikTok sound · original sound - oliviaintech

Promoted product

Ultravirew

Why it worked

The video provides a direct comparison between two AI tools for code review, addressing a specific pain point for developers (catching bugs before production). The creator's personal experience and clear recommendation add value and relatability.

Summary

The video compares Anthropic's new AI review tool, Ultravirew, against Codex for PR code reviews. While Ultravirew found one issue missed by Codex, Codex identified more issues and dead code, making it the preferred choice for the creator due to its price.

Structure

1Introduction of Ultravirew vs. Codex
2Explanation of AI review tools' importance
3Comparison of Ultravirew and Codex findings
4Creator's conclusion and recommendation

Product placement

Anthropic (company) - ACTS - released ultravirew, their PR reviewer. Removing it would change the video's topic. Codex (AI tool) - ACTS - used for PR reviews, compared against ultravirew. Removing it would change the video's comparison. Ultravirew (AI tool) - ACTS - PR reviewer that can cost $5 to $20. Removing it would change the video's topic.

Original caption

I tried claudes new /ultrareview pr review vs codex and this is what I found #vibecoding #claudecode #anthropic

More from @oliviaintech

On-screen text

/ultrareview vs. codex

Transcript

Anthropic recently released ultravirew, their PR reviewer that can cost $5 to $20 a PR review. If you're wondering if it's any good, I just tried it side by side with Codex, and this is what I saw. If you are shipping vibecoded code to real users, I highly recommend using an AI review tool. It's the easiest way to just catch bugs before they hit production. But I will admit there aren't great products right now. There's just a lot of variability every time you run a review, and I think that's kind of what ultravirew is trying to solve. It seems to essentially run multiple code reviews in parallel in the cloud. And then afterwards, merge and dedupe the findings. And so I just ran a big PR side by side in ultravirew and in Codex and ultravirew's run this time did find one real issue that Codex didn't catch, but unfortunately, it just found that one issue. Codex, on the other hand, found three more issues and some dead code. This was just one run, but given the price, I think I'm just gonna stick with Codex for now. You do still have to run it multiple times, but at least it does seem the most