@journeyshouse — 112x breakout

Loading video…

The Lindsay Clancy theory I haven't seen anyone talk about...

@journeyshouse

8.4K followers · usually 8.0K views a post

Views

718.5K

Likes

66.0K

Comments

3.5K

4.8K

View velocity

+97.1K views over 4.2d · ~23.1K/day · 5 observations

Why it worked

The creator taps into a widely discussed true crime case and presents a novel, albeit speculative, theory. Her emotional delivery and personal investment in solving the case create a sense of urgency and intrigue, encouraging viewer engagement and discussion.

Summary

The creator presents a theory about the Lindsay Clancy case, suggesting that Clancy may have sent Patrick out on errands specifically so she could commit the crime while he was away. She expresses distress and disbelief about her own theory.

Structure

1Introduction of the Lindsay Clancy theory
2Recounting the night of the children's deaths
3Presenting the theory about Patrick being sent out
4Speculating on Clancy's motive and guilt
5Expressing personal distress and disbelief

On-screen text

The Lindsay Clancy theory I haven't seen anyone talk about...

Transcript

I literally feel like I'm going crazy. Like I'm shaking right now because I feel like I just solved the Lindsay Clancy case. I haven't seen anyone talk about... but so the night that the children lost their lives, may God rest their souls. Lindsay sent Patrick out allegedly to run a couple errands. And they saw him on camera at CVS and like at the restaurant. But what if because when he got back, the children were already gone. What if Lindsay may have sent him out specifically so that she could commit the crime while he was gone and that's why she's on trial right now? You guys, I'm literally freaking out. Like I don't know what to think. I don't know if I sound crazy like, I don't know. I feel like I literally just cracked this case.