Can we just discuss misleading labeling in apparel in Australia?

Can we just discuss misleading labeling in apparel in Australia? Because I'm seeing a lot of examples of this and it's bothering me and I just want to know if anyone else feels the same way. So I got served ads for this really cute suede bomber jacket from Henne, right? And when I click through, I see the price point and that sort of was the first thing that clocked that it's probably not actual suede because in Australia, suede and leather products are at least a jacket would be at least $500, $600 at minimum. But in the description, it's called a suede bomber and then when you read it, it's described as a new suede fabrication. And a new suede fabrication doesn't exactly scream it's real or not real. It's not exactly clear until you go and check the fine print. And yeah, when you check the fine print, you'll see that it is synthetic. And me as a seasoned kind of experienced shopper, I kind of clocked it straight away with the price and then the description, but I don't think 20-year-old me would have known that. Like I think if I when I was 20 and if I read suede fabrication and suede jacket, I would have thought, oh, what a great deal. And this is where I'm curious, does anyone else feel the same way? Did anyone else clearly know that that jacket wasn't actually suede or are you surprised? Because I could be overreacting, but then I did check in terms of what is permitted under Australian consumer law. And it's very specific, like the terms leather and suede should only be used by actual leather and suede products and then the other acceptable terms are faux leather or like microfiber suede. And in this case, they haven't used that terminology. They've used the terminology of the suede fabrication, which again, I just don't think is super clear, but maybe I'm wrong. You tell me, what do you guys think?