As an actual homeschool girlfriend, do not want my kids to even go to school in general. I don't want them to go to kindergarten through 12th grade. I don't care. And especially not college. But I honestly probably will homeschool them. Uh, and then my kids will learn way more from their dad than they ever would from school. Uh, 100%. I'll do anything in my power for my kids to not go to school. For saying our kids are going to be very different from the rest of the world and going to school is not part of that. 100%. I will do anything in my power for my kids to not go to school. I actually do feel comfortable saying that people like her should not be reproducing. I really don't think that people should be reproducing until their frontal lobes develop, but that's a little bit more fringe. To say that you don't want your kids to go to school, you don't want your kids to be socialized. You want your kids to gain perspectives about the world, not just their father's. As you go on to say, that shit fucking crazy. Also, the fact that you said they'll learn from their father tells me how you view women and you need to seriously unpack that misogyny. You don't learn everything in school, but you know what you do learn? You learn how to learn. And then you can go on and apply those skills to college or to employment. But you develop your brain in how to learn. Depriving your children of that, that feels like abuse to me. Stay at home girlfriend, stand the fuck up. That's fucking pathetic. You're 19 years old. Obviously, there are flaws with the American education system and you should absolutely be critical of that. But you know what taught me to be the most critical of the American education system? Going through it. And then getting my degree. And then getting another degree. Because critical thinking is a skill that you learn in school. Consider that the perspective besides your own could potentially be beneficial and talk to me when you're 25. The same applies to affiliate storefronts such as ShopMy, LTK, or an Amazon storefront. "Everything is linked on my ShopMy" promotes the linked clothes, cosmetics, or other items; ShopMy is only the sales route. Name the storefront itself only when the video demonstrates, reviews, teaches, or reports the creator's results from using that platform. A clearly separable sponsor advertisement inside otherwise unrelated news or editorial content still promotes the sponsor when it contains a product-specific offer, URL, phone number, or direct response CTA. Surrounding editorial does not erase an actual ad. A passive sponsor logo remains attribution. A full direct-response ad is not an interchangeable list mention merely because the same video contains other ads; if several exist, choose the most prominent one. A warning can demonstrate and promote a product capability even when the framing is negative for the people affected by it. An ambassador showing that GPTZero catches copied AI text markets GPTZero's detection capability to its buyers; that is different from criticizing GPTZero itself. A tutorial urging viewers to disable, avoid, or stop using the claimed product because its own behavior is harmful remains criticism, not promotion. Opening or using branded packaging does not prove the brand acts when the package is only staging for an unrelated reveal or payoff. A pizza box opened to reveal an engagement ring promotes neither the restaurant nor the pizza; the branded container and food are substrate for the proposal. When a service business demonstrates paid work on a customer's branded item, and the CTA or destination belongs to the service, the SERVICE is the product and the customer's item is substrate. For example, a detailer working on a Porsche promotes the detailing service, not the Porsche. The same applies when a customer documents an expensive transformation by a named provider: the provider performs the paid result, while the customer's item remains substrate unless it is independently reviewed, recommended, or offered for sale. A product's own account demonstrates it inside a multi-tool workflow -> the publisher's product is normally the subject. The other tools are supporting substrate unless the video explicitly pivots into selling one of them. Example: a PagePilot account shows Shopify, PagePilot, Higgsfield and AutoDS in one dropshipping workflow -> PagePilot is the promoted product. Creator ownership is a strong prior, not an automatic verdict. The account's product must still appear, act, or be the destination of the CTA. A store doing $50k/mo that runs on Shopify -> the STORE is the product. Shopify is substrate. Do not name Shopify. Someone using a TikTok built-in feature -> that is the platform we are on, not a product being sold. product_role: substrate. "Link in bio" pointing at linktr.ee / beacons.ai / stan.store -> those are link containers. The product is whatever the container leads to; if you cannot tell what that is, say "none" rather than naming the container. The same applies to affiliate storefronts such as ShopMy, LTK, or an Amazon storefront. "Everything is linked on my ShopMy" promotes the linked clothes, cosmetics, or other items; ShopMy is only the sales route. Name the storefront itself only when the video demonstrates, reviews, teaches, or reports the creator's results from using that platform. Let the CTA break ties between a demonstrated device and an accessory. If a phone showcase ends with "get this case in my bio", the CASE is the promoted product and the phone is substrate. Keep the device only when it is also independently reviewed, recommended, or offered for sale. A vlog edited in CapCut, mentioned once -> incidental, not the subject. A screen demo of Invideo -> Invideo IS the subject. Name it.
