DM us Triple T

Tung Tung DEXERTO ENTERTAINMENT > ROBLOX Tung Tung Sahur is at the center of a bizarre federal "custody battle" over brainrot characters by Zackerie Fairfax Published: Jul 01, 2026, 20:11 is in Tung Tung Sahur, one of the internet's biggest brainrot characters, is now at the center of a federal legal fight over who can control viral The case pits Spyder Games LLC and Speedy Simulator Gaming LLC, the companies behind Roblox hit Steal a Brainrot, against Mementum Lab SAS, a French company that says it represents creators behind some of the most popular brainrot characters online. federal court and a Page 1 of 8 Case 5:25-cv-10248-NW Document 1 Filed 11/26/25 Page 2 of 8 The Game is designed as a "treasure hunt" into a world of uninhibited characters "brainrots." During gameplay, the brainrots proceed to a slow, monotonous line along a path that runs through the center of the arena. Players capture brainrots and transport them to connective bases (small holding areas located at the arena's perimeters) to earn virtual currency. The brainrots in the Game were created by plaintiffs, but they are inspired by internet meme figures that were created using artificial intelligence programs. Although AI-generated content is a common phenomenon, courts have found it protectable because the Copyright Act requires all work to be authorized by a human being. Keller v. Perlmuter, 30 F.4th 1039, 1044 (9th Cir. 2018) ("A monkey, because it was non-human, lacked copyrightable authorship."). The Copyright Act with respect to photos: the monkey took of itself's, Kelley v. Chicago Park Dist., 197 F.3d 290, 304 (7th Cir. 204 [sic])("Authorship is an entirely human endeavor."). See also Feist Publ'ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340, 361 (1991) (U.S. Copyright Office Practices § 306 (3d ed. 2021) (explaining the requirement of human authorship); 2 William F. Patry, Patry on Copyright § 3:19 (March 2025 (explaining the requirement of human authorship). That the Copyright Office has "rightly rejected [an application for work created by AI] for lack of human authorship." On March 2023, the Copyright Office published guidance concerning works created by artificial intelligence: "The work's traditional elements of authorship were produced by a machine, the work lacks human authorship and the Office will not register works from a human and produces complex written, visual, or musical works in response to the "traditional elements of authorship" that are determined and executed by the technology - not the human creator. When an AI technology develops a work, the human creator is Case 5:25-cv-10248-NW Document 1 Filed 11/26/25 Page 3 of 8 7. Defendant Momentum Lab describes itself as "the (Brainrot) Memes Agency." claims that it owns or controls the copyrights to over a dozen brainrots in the Game that were generated by artificial intelligence tools (and more than 50% of the entire "brainrot universe" created by artificial intelligence tools). For example, defendant contends that it owns or controls the copyrights to the brainrot universe: Tung Tung Sahur U Din Din Dun Ma Din Din Dun Dun Tung Tung Sahur U Din Din Din Din Din Din Din Ma Din Din Din Dun Dun Defendant has threatened to have the Game removed from Roblox through a Millennium Copyright Act takedown notice unless plaintiffs pay them substantial sums of money for the right to continue to use the brainrots. Accordingly, plaintiffs seek an order that defendant does not have copyright over the brainrots. PARTIES Plaintiff Spyder Games LLC is a Louisianan (limited liability company) Steal a Roblox Steal a Brainrot so big BRUNO MARS Mars concert inside it 12.7 million players at once momentum told pull him licensing talks fell apart game put then steal rot sued telling a momentum can't own Triple AI GB The legal arguments "The Italian Brainrot characters that we're talking about here all come out of AI image generators, and the copyright office has been very clear and very consistent in its guidance, which is that if something is generated by AI without sufficient human authorship, it's not copyrightable -- and no court has disagreed with that," said Aaron Moss, a lawyer representing Spyder Games in the lawsuit, in an interview with GamesBeat. On the other hand, Momentum Labs is relying on legal precedent backing up the idea that creators can own the internet memes they create. In past years, creators have successfully claimed IP and generated revenue from widespread memes Keyboard Cat and Charlie Bit My Finger, and Momentum Labs views Italian brainrot memes like Tung Tung Sahur and "U Din Din Dun" as a similar case. To create the character, Noxa had to come up with the name and input a prompt into an AI tool -- human inputs that could give the creator a valid ownership claim. AI image generators, and the copyright office has been very clear and very consistent in its guidance, which is that if something is generated by AI without sufficient human authorship, it's not copyrightable -- and no court has disagreed with that. US Copyright copyrighted Mementum Lab @mementumlab Follow AI and Brainrot Enter the Licensing Arena What makes them unique? A portion of this content is created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI). This phenomenon is shaking up traditional licensing norms. Brainrot content is not image a human gave his name his voice his story and even they file trademark claims him and ENTERTAINMENT > ROBLOX Tung Tung Sahur is at the center of a federal "custody battle" over brainrot characters by Zackarie Fairfax Published: Jul 01, 2026, 20:11 A judge has not yet ruled on those core questions. The next major hearing currently listed in the filings is set for September 16, 2026, when the court is scheduled to hear motions tied to both Momentum's attempt to the next September 16th could decide of 22 more brain rot characters a company the internet