I GENUINELY NEED

I genuinely need someone to explain to me what the fork the bar for impeachment is in the United States because Bill Clinton was impeached technically for obstruction of justice. But let's remember what the underlying about a sexual relationship between two adults. He lied under and Congress said enough to impeach the president of the United States. Okay, now look where we are. The sitting president, United States, appears throughout records connected to Jeffrey Epstein. There are FBI tips, witness and allegations involving him. There are FBI interview records containing an allegation that Trump essayed a girl when she was a minor. Trump denies that allegation. It has not been proven in and I'm not an allegation is a conviction. But that isn't my forking point. My point is the bar because apparently America once looked at a president lying under oath about a sexual relationship between two adults went constitutional impeach him. But today we're looking at federal archive concerning one of notorious child, you know, trafficking operations in American history. The sitting president appears repeatedly broader records. Allegations involving him are among those records. And we're still fighting over whether the government has even released. And Congress is doing what? Like I'm taking forking crazy pills. Forking crazy pills. Allegations are not convictions. Being named in a file is of a crime. But if perjury about an adult sexual relationship cleared America's political bar for impeachment. How the fork even clear the for the most aggressive investigation imaginable? That's the part I cannot reconcile. Not because Clinton accountable for lying under oath, but because our standard for how seriously presidential misconduct. What the fork happened to that standard?