WAIT... 👀 Did Dr. Zeisel just change how we look at Lindsay Clancy’s behavior before January 24?

WAIT... 👀 Did Dr. Zeisel just change how we look at Lindsay Clancy’s behavior before January 24? Because his testimony connected some VERY important dots. First: the psychological testing. Dr. Zeisel testified that testing administered during the government’s evaluation found: “No evidence” she was faking or exaggerating psychiatric symptoms. ⚠️ That does NOT prove psychosis. But it DOES matter in the debate over whether her symptoms were fabricated. Then came a HUGE piece of testimony. While Lindsay was hospitalized shortly after January 24, she spoke to Patrick using Dr. Zeisel’s phone. According to Zeisel, Lindsay said she had heard a male voice ordering her to kill the children and then herself. Zeisel testified that he had not suggested hearing voices to her first. But THIS detail may be even more important... According to Zeisel, BEFORE January 24, Lindsay believed her thoughts were so loud that OTHER PEOPLE COULD HEAR THEM. This wasn’t simply: “I’m having horrible thoughts.” She reportedly believed other people could actually hear what was happening inside her mind. Then Zeisel started connecting the months leading up to January 24... Anxiety. Insomnia. Multiple medications. Poor response. Worsening symptoms. Dissociation. Feeling empty. Difficulty functioning. Continuing to seek help. Eventually, she voluntarily entered McLean Hospital. But could someone experiencing psychosis still FUNCTION? According to Dr. Zeisel: YES. Make a phone call? Yes. Drive a car? Yes. Perform purposeful actions? Yes. He testified that psychotic symptoms can come and go. And THAT changes the context of an argument we’ve heard throughout this trial: “But she was functioning normally...” According to Zeisel, the ability to perform purposeful actions does NOT automatically rule out psychosis. And he’s not finished testifying. 👇 Did Dr. Zeisel’s testimony change how YOU view the evidence?