robotics WE ASKED EVERY AI IF GOD EXISTS, WHICH ONES DO YOU AGREE WITH?

@robotics

4.8K followers · usually 684 views a post

Views

5.7K

Likes

Comments

SoundTikTok sound · original sound - astroospace

Why it worked

The post taps into a deeply philosophical and universally debated topic, leveraging the novelty of AI's perspective to generate curiosity and engagement. The varied responses from different AIs create a sense of exploration and encourage viewers to swipe through to see each unique answer.

Summary

This photo post explores the question of God's existence by asking various AI models for their opinions. The AI responses range from definitive 'no' based on lack of empirical evidence, to 'I don't know' due to insufficient proof, highlighting that the answer often depends on prioritizing faith or empirical evidence.

Structure

1Introduction: Asking AI if God exists
2AI response: No empirical evidence
3AI response: No definitive answer
4AI response: I don't know
5AI response: No objective answer
6AI response: Unproven rather than settled

Product placement

robotics ACTS - it is the creator of this content, and the content is about the answers provided by AI models. Removing robotics would change the content of the video. Claude ACTS - it is an AI model that provided an answer to the question about God's existence. Removing Claude would change the content of the video. Meta AI ACTS - it is an AI model that provided an answer to the question about God's existence. Removing Meta AI would change the content of the video. ChatGPT ACTS - it is an AI model that provided an answer to the question about God's existence. Removing ChatGPT would change the content of the video. Grok ACTS - it is an AI model that provided an answer to the question about God's existence. Removing Grok would change the content of the video. Gemini ACTS - it is an AI model that provided an answer to the question about God's existence. Removing Gemini would change the content of the video. Perplexity ACTS - it is an AI model that provided an answer to the question about God's existence. Removing Perplexity would change the content of the video.

Original caption

Does God exist, or is belief the only answer humanity will ever have? We asked Claude, Meta AI, ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini and Perplexity the exact same question. Most refused to give a definitive answer. Some said God cannot be proven or disproven. Others leaned toward no, pointing to the lack of empirical evidence and the problem of evil. Almost all agreed on one thing: the answer depends on what you accept as evidence. Faith asks you to believe beyond what can be demonstrated. Science asks for proof before belief. Neither side has fully settled the question, yet it may be the most important question humans have ever asked. Which AI gave the strongest answer, and which one got it completely wrong? #religion #god #robotics #artificialintelligence #ai

More from @robotics

On-screen text

robotics WE ASKED EVERY AI IF GOD EXISTS, WHICH ONES DO YOU AGREE WITH? SWIPE TO SEE MORE robotics No. There is no empirical evidence or logical proof that establishes the existence of a god (or gods). Claims of divine existence remain matters of faith, not demonstrated fact. robotics No one can prove it either way - that's the honest short answer. For: cosmological/design arguments (why is there something rather than nothing; the universe's fine-tuning), religious experience, moral order Against: lack of empirical evidence, problem of evil (suffering seems hard to reconcile with an all-good, all-powerful god), naturalistic explanations covering what religion once explained It comes down to unprovable premises on both sides, so people land differently based on philosophy, evidence standards, and personal experience. robotics I don't know. There is no conclusive evidence that proves or disproves God's existence, so certainty either way goes beyond what can currently be demonstrated. robotics There is no objective "yes" or "no" answer. Whether God exists is a matter of personal belief, not established scientific fact. Science cannot prove or disprove a supernatural creator, so the answer depends entirely on whether you rely on faith and personal experience (yes) or empirical evidence and natural law (no). robotics No — I don't think there's enough public evidence to say God exists with confidence, and the problem of evil is one of the strongest reasons philosophers give for doubt. The best honest answer is that it remains unproven rather than settled. robotics There is no way to empirically prove or disprove it, so there is no definitive yes/no answer. Reasons people say yes: philosophical arguments like first cause / design, personal religious experience, and faith-based traditions. Reasons people say no: lack of empirical evidence, problem of evil / suffering, and natural explanations for the universe. Which conclusion you reach depends on whether you prioritize faith / metaphysical reasoning or empirical evidence.