Hook

Their other posts in the index, biggest breakout first.
The thing is, some influencers are annoying, okay? But that's like a people thing, that's not a profession thing. And I think it was Paige Paul said that in her article, or someone said that in the cut article, and I agree with it. It's just like every type of person. I know bankers that are great, I know bankers that are annoying. So for Nantucket to put up that sign that says no influencers, which I really, I say this all the time on this channel. I talk about financial transparency and content creation because it is one of the only industries where women outperform men. So for them to say no influencers, it's like that is targeted towards a specific type of person, and unfortunately, that demographic is mostly women. It feels a little. She's claiming to be feminist does not feel very feminist behavior, in my opinion. With that said, I do understand that it can be annoying if there's a small town disrupted with people filming everywhere. Again, I said, I have been in events, on influencer trips with people who are disruptive with taking content. But then why does the sign not say no videography, no photography? Because I've also seen old ladies be annoying with their phones too. It feels like if it was about the behavior, it could have been targeted more about the behavior rather than targeting a group of people, some of which were very intelligent and use content creation and use social media as a launch pad to build businesses and build careers. And I just think that's amazing. So I think the sign could have been a little reworked. Kinder