He misspelled the word

@misinformedmedia

21.5K followers · usually 4.8K views a post

Views

158.6K

Likes

10.3K

Comments

296

Shares

346

SoundTikTok sound · original sound - misinformedmedia

Why it worked

The video likely resonated due to its focus on a controversial court case and the perceived injustice, framing the actions as misguided rather than purely malicious, which can be a compelling narrative.

Summary

The video discusses a court case where a judge dismissed an application to brand an offender as a high-risk terrorist. The judge found the offender was truthful about being paid to carry out attacks, but the attacks were not antisemitic due to misspellings and targeting the wrong location.

Structure

1Misspelling of 'Israel'
2Use of 'PKK' without knowledge of its meaning
3Intention to target a Jewish business but wrong location
4Instructions given for graffiti
5Inability to correctly identify targets

On-screen text

He misspelled the word Isr*el Court judge knew the attacks were not antisemitic

Transcript

He misspelled the word Israel. He wrote PKK without knowing what the acronym stands for. They were told to target a Jewish business but they got the location wrong. They were simply told where to go and what to do down to the very words that they were being asked to graffiti onto businesses that they could not even identify correctly.

Original caption

The alleged spree of antisemitic attacks which took place across Sydney in late 2024 and led to the arrest and imprisonment of a 20-year-old Sydney man, who has since turned 22, were a "gross miscarriage of justice", a court has heard. The application to brand the offender as a high-risk t*rrorist was dismissed after a NSW Supreme Court found that the offender was telling the truth about being paid $4,000 by an unknown recruiter to carry out the attacks.