On-screen text
So You're Being Sued?
STATE OF NEW MEXICO
DISTRICT OF SANTA FE
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC
Plaintiff,
VS.
Defendant(s)
CIVIL COMPLAINT (BREACH OF CONTRACT)
Plaintiff, through undersigned counsel, alleges as follows:
1. This Court has subject matter and personal jurisdiction. All pertinent acts and omissions giving rise to this lawsuit occurred in this jurisdiction, and/or Defendant(s) are residents of this jurisdiction.
2. The full name and address of Defendant(s) is as follows:
3. The last two (2) digits of the Defendant's social security number, contained in the original creditor's records are as follows: 91
4. By accepting and using an offered extension of credit, Defendant entered into a credit account with Citibank, N.A. Diamond Preferred. Defendant is in default under the terms of the debt. Plaintiff is the successor-in-interest and current owner of the debt.
Let Me Tell You Why
This Complaint is Funny
WANNA KNOW HOW
THE COURT HAS
JURISDICTION.
TRANSLATION: WE ARE IN
THE RIGHT COURTHOUSE.
NEXT, YOU OPENED
CITY BANK CREDIT
CARD.
FAIR ENOUGH. BUT
IMPORTANT SENTENCE.
WE ARE THE
SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST.
TRANSLATION: WE WEREN'T
BORROWED FROM,
DEBT. LATER,
THAT'S GONNA MATTER.
5. The Plaintiff in this action is NOT the original creditor and the name and address under which the original creditor did business with the Defendant is:
Citibank, N.A.
Sioux Falls, SD 57108
6. The last four (4) digits of the Defendant's account number, used by the original creditor as of the date of default are as follows: 5672
7. The balance due at the time of default is as follows: $3,556.16.
8. The total amount of the debt claimed, is $3,556.16, itemized as follows:
Principal amount due: $3,556.16
Other charges, fees and expenses: $0.00
9. The termination of the amount claimed set forth above does not include attorney fees and court costs.
10. The date of last payment made by Defendant is as follows: November 26, 2024.
11. Plaintiff status, consistent with Rule 1-011 NMBRA, that the applicable statute of limitations on this claim has not run.
12. The name and address of the current owner of this debt is as follows:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
1200 W. 7th Street, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92108
13. PlaintiffIS NOT a collection agency.
14. A copy of the instrument of writing on which the action is founded IS attached as Exhibit A.
15. Plaintiff alleges entitlement to enforce the debt but is not the original creditor. Plaintiff has attached an affidavit showing the chain of title or assignment of the debt.
TRY AND PROVE
OWNERSHIP.
THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR
WAS CITY BANK.
THE BALANCE IS
THREE THOUSAND
FIFTY SIX DOLLARS
AND SIXTEEN CENTS.
NOTICE SOMETHING. NO
NO FEES. JUST
SAY YOU OWE.
THE STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS HASN'T EXPIRED.
TRANSLATION PLEASE DON'T
DISMISS THIS BECAUSE
WE WAITED TOO
LONG TO SUE.
THEN MY FAVORITE
LINE. THE PLAINTIFF
IS NOT A
COLLECTION AGENCY.
INTERESTING CHOICE OF
WORDS.
APPARENTLY, THEY SAY,
WE'VE ATTACHED AN
AFFIDAVIT SHOWING THE
CHAIN OF TITLE.
THAT'S LAWYERS SPEAK
FOR TRUST US.
WE REALLY OWN
THIS DEBT. WHETHER
THAT AFFIDAVIT IS
ACTUALLY ENOUGH,
QUESTION.
NOW THEY ASK
EVERYTHING.
THE MONEY, THE
COURT COSTS,
INTEREST AFTER JUDGMENT,
AND ANY OTHER
RELIEF THE COURT
THINKS IS FAIR.
TRANSLATION WE'LL TAKE
WHATEVER YOU GIVE
US.
Even if this complaint is
funny, it's deadly to
your Wallet and credit
if you don't answer
COMPLAINT, REMEMBER?
THIS ISN'T PROOF
THAT THEY WIN.
THEY'RE CLAIMING.
AND IF YOU
FILE AN ANSWER
Sample Templates in Bio
TO PROVE EVERY
CLAIMS WITH ADMISSIBLE
EVIDENCE.